Skip to main content

Optimizing immunoprecipitation reactions remains a challenge in research. Different interactions and subpopulations of cells respond diversely to many experimental variables, and often finding the right set of conditions is an uphill battle. Much preliminary research is focussed on understanding the compositions of macromolecular assemblies and their inter-relationships to gain insight into the biological processes they enable. (Co-)immunoprecipitation (IP) coupled with protein mass spectrometry (MS) has proven to be a very successful technique for this type of analysis.

A key benefit of IP is that it allows target macromolecules and/or assembly capture directly from a biological source, without impacting native protein processing, assembly, or post-translational modification. Not to be understated, MS is also particularly attractive in regard to interactive studies as it can provide a detailed analysis of the functional and structural analyses of a macromolecular complex.

Free article: does it matter which magnetic separation rack I use in my cell sorting processes?

So overall, an IP-MS experiment can provide a sensitive and accurate characterization of proteins, and help elucidate their response to regulatory mechanisms. In these efforts it is of paramount importance to maintain physiological interactions in vitro while limiting artifacts; therefore, a well-optimized IP should have the following considerations:

  • Molecular interactions must be maintained throughout the capture.
  • The capture protein and complex should not form spurious interactions.
  • The chosen antibody must be able to bind its target and exhibit low off-target binding.

Knowing that in vitro chemical conditions define IP outcomes, Xie, et al. (2024) developed a multiparameter screening method to optimize IP results. In their research, cells were first cultured, harvested, mechanically lysed, then frozen. Next, the team used affinity capture to isolate protein complexes from the cellular extracts. This step utilized an affinity media made up of an affinity ligand and antibody that interacted with the proteins of interest, coupled to micron-sized paramagnetic beads. Using magnetic bead separation techniques, target protein complexes were effectively purified and ready for use in liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS). SDS-PAGE then confirmed the results of the experiment, verifying which IP conditions had substantial effects on IP results. Such interactome analysis efforts will help to optimize IP conditions for future research to reproduce key features of the microenvironment, providing a more accurate and clear understanding of the physicochemical mechanisms of the proteome.

The team states that future prospects intend to build on this preliminary research, while integrating the use of magnetic separation systems that provide a controlled, constant, magnetic force. Such magnetic bead separators, like those provided by Sepmag System, have the ability to improve reproducibility and ease scaling-up to large volumes without unexpected changes in capture efficiency. Additionally, using magnetic bead separators that deliver a constant magnetic force reduces the potential for shearing of target molecules. This shearing, characteristic of column-based separations, is mechanical degradation on the molecular level that causes the target proteins to irreversibly break down. The potential for shear degradation, however, is significantly reduced when using magnetic bead separators that use a controlled constant magnetic force.

The team also emphasized that future experiments will consider using a Sepmag monitoring system, capable of tracking the behaviors of magnetic beads in different solutions, at different volumes, and in different vessels. The optical monitoring systems provided by Sepmag Systems are real-time, nondestructive, and provide empirically derived data for the entire separation process. Because Sepmag offers monitoring hardware and software for experiments at different scales (i.e., MONITOR for R&D applications and QUALITANCE for production) specific detailed aspects of the separation process, like separation time for various suspensions, can be harmonized. Such technologies also provide precise data on particular aspects of the affinity separation process, that may require further optimization, to provide the most accurate IP results.

Xie, S., Saba, L. J., Jiang, H., Bringas, O. R., Oghbaie, M., Di Stéfano, L., Sherman, V., & LaCava, J. (2024). Multiparameter screen optimizes immunoprecipitation. Biotechniques/BioTechniques, 76 (4). https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2023-0051

Free article: does it matter which magnetic separation rack I use in my cell sorting processes?

Lluis M. Martínez | SEPMAG Chief Scientific Officer

Founder of SEPMAG, Lluis holds a PhD in Magnetic Materials by the UAB. He has conducted research at German and Spanish academic institutions. Having worked in companies in Ireland, USA and Spain, he has more than 20 years of experience applying magnetic materials and sensors to industrial products and processes. He has filed several international patents on the field and co-authored more than 20 scientific papers, most of them on the subject of magnetic particle movement.

Leave a Reply